After I read the third article almost the Panama Papers, I nevertheless didn't empathize what the floor was. Lots of documents almost banking operations were stolen somewhere inwards Panama. They may incorporate many things. But what produce they genuinely incorporate to brand us interested? Perhaps a listing of names of people who have got used "tax heavens" to relieve some coin on taxes. I could empathize that at that spot was a potential for a story. But was at that spot already a story? (Bill reminded me that the give-and-take is "haven", non "heaven". That sucks. In Czech, nosotros telephone phone them "tax paradises" so I assumed they had to live heaven. Please assume they're heavens because several paragraphs over hither wouldn't brand sense.)
Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 leader of Republic of Iceland is inwards trouble. That's i floor I empathize which could live nifty if Republic of Iceland weren't every bit populous every bit 2 Pilsens.
Then I read lots of comments almost the hypothetical touching on of the Panama Papers on Putin – except that his call doesn't seem at that spot at all. Instead, the documents brand a "shocking" revelation that Russian people also deposit as well as withdraw coin inwards banks as well as some of the wealthy people may have got met Putin (like a acme cello histrion who has used taxation sky as well as met Putin – I exploded inwards laughter when I read almost this "juicy story") or someone who has met someone who has met someone who has met Putin. When it comes to this Russian interpretation of the Panama Papers, I only have got to grip amongst this op-ed. This administration of the Panama Papers tells us to a greater extent than almost the illness plaguing the contemporary Western journalism than almost Russia.
Some other people could have got used taxation heavens as well as may live inwards trouble. But spell the Panama Papers are presented every bit a scandal analogous e.g. to the ClimateGate, I don't come across whatever similar shocking sentences inwards the Panama Papers. So they may live analogous except that they are clearly not.
Now, I retrieve that it's to a greater extent than sensible as well as to a greater extent than ethical to pay taxes at the house where the actual economical action takes house (and obviously, I have got e'er done so). At the same moment, whatever freedom-compatible organisation that tries to arrive at this outcome unavoidably allows some variety of "usage of taxation heavens", so much of it only has to live legal. And permit me also say that at the end, I retrieve that the "tax heavens" are improve than "tax hells" as well as if I were fighting against something, it would live hells, daemons, as well as devils rather than heavens, angels, as well as God. If you're fighting against the heavens as well as shooting angels, you're in all probability evil. It's to a greater extent than oftentimes than non to a greater extent than correct (and beneficial for the economical progress) for countries to have got lower taxation rates as well as the taxation heavens are a tool yesteryear which Nature shows this constabulary of Hers to us (and peculiarly to the managers of the "tax hells")!
Some random businessmen as well as maybe politicians could have got been linked to taxation heavens inwards some way. Great. But what is the big story? And what's behind the floor as well as behind the thought that it should live a floor at all?
Mr Ivo Strejček [Eevaw stray-Czech], an official at the Václav Klaus Institute, has a possible interpretation. This whole trial is a ritual yesteryear which folks around George Soros – a powerful far left puppet main who oftentimes uses the nickname Open Society – desire to strengthen the chances that global taxes as well as similar aspects of the global authorities volition live adopted.
It's a flake insane for the huge aß named Soros – who, amid other things, owes almost $7 billion inwards taxes – influence the footing nations' attitudes towards taxation but that's what nosotros see, anyway. Here is Strejček's accept on the affair:
Ivo Strejček: Panama Papers – a route towards global taxation?
The content of documents stolen from Mossack Fonseca, a legal problem solid amongst headquarters inwards Panama (therefore Panama Papers), is oftentimes described every bit the "greatest revelation inwards the history of journalism which unmasks subway scheme offshore operations of firms, current, as well as erstwhile politicians" [1]. That's the sentiment of those who brought this whole floor to us as well as who are administering it. We must interpret such a declaration every bit a real serious one. That's some other argue why nosotros must clarify some of the so far known facts related to this trial as well as house them inwards a broader context.
– High German daily Süddeutsche Zeitung has received millions of records inwards a giant book 2.6 terabytes a twelvemonth ago. The sender was an anonymous origin (calling himself John Doe) who stole them (i.e. obtained illegally, non accidentally from spontaneously leaked data) from the Panama-based problem solid Mossack-Fonseca [2].
– The origin (John Doe) transferred the information to the editors using encrypted communication without whatever personal contact. The identity of John Doe is unknown. He didn't desire whatever compensation for them, precisely "a few safety guarantees". [3]
– The Federal Republic of Federal Republic of Germany daily has established 2 teams to evaluate the information as well as simultaneously, it gave the information also to ICIJ, the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists. It covers 400 journalists from lxxx countries employed e.g. at The Guardian, BBC, Le Monde, ORF, Süddeutsche Zeitung, L'Espresso, Le Soir, The Asahi Shimbun, CBC, New York Times, The Washington Post. [4]
– ICIJ presents itself every bit a non-profit organization. Center for Public Integrity is the establishment that genuinely funds it, yesteryear almost 1.5 1000000 dollars, as well as a major sponsor of that is, amid others, the Open Society Foundation of George Soros. [5]
– ICIJ is also a fellow member of the U.S. organisation Organised Crime as well as Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP) which is funded yesteryear the U.S. authorities establishment USAID every bit good every bit yesteryear Soros' Open Society Foundation. [6]
– The Czech organisation cooperating amongst OCCRP is i founded inwards 2013 (accidentally (?), the same twelvemonth when the stolen information were in all probability given to Süddeutsche Zeitung), named Czech Center for Investigative Journalism. [7] The funding or composition of expenses of this midpoint are non known. The organisation has already published its partial comments almost the "Czech" business office of the Panama Papers. [8]
It's non necessary to defend the transfer of taxation residencies from the places of the actual economical action to the taxation heavens. Firms should pay taxes at the places where they produce the tangible business.
However, it's necessary to summarize several conclusions as well as inquire several questions linked to the split of publishing of this giant book of data, amongst the seriousness of the content, because without these perspectives, it's non possible to constitute a holistic motion painting almost the story:
1. It was a theft.
2. It is non known who did it, what was his motivation, what were his goals. Some distance as well as careful conclusions may live appropriate for those reasons.
3. The president of the Czech midpoint Ms Pavla Holcová claims that at that spot are 283 Czech names inwards the stolen information – but she has unmasked alone a few names on her website. Why these names as well as non others? Even The Guardian said that "not all names volition live published". [9] Why this selectiveness? Are the citizens learning genuinely everything through these investigative journalists? Is it possible to avoid speculations whether at to the lowest degree the journalists were given the total information? And why produce these journalists desire to cash inwards one's chips along the information almost some people subway scheme spell others volition live unmasked?
4. If the reports are supposed to live revealed gradually, why? What should live the finish of this selective (and, inwards effect, deeply corrupting) approach?
This foggy as well as unclear background should encourage us to a sober as well as careful search for answers.
A conclusion
It is clear that this floor volition energize the already excited social atmosphere believing inwards omnipresent corruption. It volition aid some other moving ridge of aggressive programs amongst the finish to "remove the corrupt political dinosaurs" as well as it volition cash inwards one's chips along on strengthening the – already strong – purpose of assorted anti-corruption NGOs. I am non defending taxation evasion but i must also say that the mere action of an offshore fellowship isn't criminal inwards whatever way. Defenders of the harmonization of taxation systems at the supernational score volition abuse the floor to energize their argumentation against the taxation contest (although it's non what this floor is about) which, inwards the surroundings weakened yesteryear the touching on of the Panama Papers, may live successful (in the EU, attempts to harmonize straight taxes across the continent have got been live as well as kicking for long years).
Czech PM Sobotka made a declaration almost the Panama Papers. He doesn't aspect the documents to live related to anyone from his authorities but he volition carefully investigate as well as pull conclusions if necessary. He joined other governments (Spain, France, Britain) that are assuring the voters that things volition live investigated – fifty-fifty if political tremors as well as changes volition resultant from that.
The content of the transferred information isn't known to us so nosotros can't comment on those. We don't fifty-fifty know the circumstances of the information transfer, the somebody who was the intermediary of that transfer, as well as his motivations. We don't know whether all names volition live published as well as whether – as well as who – volition cherry-pick the names as well as information as well as set out them gradually. Despite these of import unclear aspects, at that spot is a potential to influence Blue Planet sentiment every bit good every bit the demeanour of the governments. We should greet this probable development amongst a dose of skepticism.
[1] https://www.occrp.org/en/panamapapers/overview/intro/
[2] http://www.panamapapers.sueddeutsche.de
[3] http://www.politico.eu/blogs/spence-on-media/2016/04/how-suddeutsche-zeitung-got-the-panama-leaks-story/
[4] https://www.icij.org/about
[5] https://www.publicintegrity.org/about/our-work/supporters
[6] https://www.occrp.org/documents/OCCRP_Annual_Report_2015.pdf
[7] https://www.occrp.org/en/about-us
[8] https://www.investigace.cz/panamapapers/
[9] http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/apr/04/the-guardian-view-on-the-panama-papers-secret-riches-and-public-rage
An sixty minutes afterward this text was written as well as Strejček's business office was translated, reports signed yesteryear Wikileaks have got appeared that they claim that at that spot be explicit records showing that this whole Panama practise was masterminded yesteryear Soros as well as his puppet Obama amongst the finish of damaging the Kremlin. If those things are true, these Soros folks are both immoral as well as stupid.
Comment Policy: Silahkan tuliskan komentar Anda yang sesuai dengan topik postingan halaman ini. Komentar yang berisi tautan tidak akan ditampilkan sebelum disetujui.
Buka Komentar
Tutup Komentar