Nanopoulos' In Addition To Pals' Model Is Dorsum To Conquer The Throne

Once upon a time, at that spot was an evil witch-and-bitch named Cernette whose majority was \(750\GeV\) too who wanted to croak the queen instead of the love king.



Fortunately, that witch-and-bitch has been killed too what we're experiencing is

The Return of the King: No-Scale \({\mathcal F}\)-\(SU(5)\),

Li, Maxin, too Nanopoulous dot out. It's dandy intelligence that the would-be \(750\GeV\) particle has been liquidated. They revisited the predictions of their shape of F-theory-based, grand unified, no-scale models too constitute some consequences that they surprisingly couldn't own got told us virtually inwards the previous 10 papers too that nosotros should travel happy about, anyway.




First, they all of a abrupt claim that the theoretical considerations inside their system are plenty to assert that the majority of the gluino exceeds \(1.9\TeV\),\[

m_{\tilde g} \geq 1.9\TeV.

\] This is an excellent, confirmed prediction of a supersymmetric theory because the LHC experiments also tell that amongst these conventions, the majority of the gluino exceeds \(1.9\TeV\). ;-)




Just to travel sure, I did discovery the full general gradual growth of the masses predicted past times their models too so I don't accept the newest ones likewise seriously. But I believe that at that spot is withal some justification too so the probability could travel something similar 0.1% that inwards a yr or two, nosotros volition take in their model to travel a potent challenger that has been partly validated past times the experiments.

In the newest paper, they desire the Higgs too top majority to travel around\[

m_h\approx 125\GeV, \quad m_{\rm top} \approx 174\GeV

\] acre the novel SUSY-related parameters are\[

\eq{
\tan\beta &\approx 25\\
M_V^{\rm flippon}&\approx (30-80)\TeV\\
M_{\chi^1_0}&\approx 380\GeV\\
M_{\tilde \tau^\pm} &\approx M_{\chi^1_0}+1 \GeV\\
M_{\tilde t_1} &\approx 1.7\TeV\\
M_{\tilde u_R} &\approx 2.7\TeV\\
M_{\tilde g} &\approx 2.1\TeV
}

\] acre the cosmological parameter \(\Omega h^2\approx 0.118\), the anomalous muon's magnetic minute \(\Delta a_\mu\approx 2\times 10^{-10}\), the branching ratio of a bottom decay \(Br(b\to s\gamma)\approx 0.00035\), the muon twain branching ratio for a B-meson \(Br(B^0_s\to \mu^+\mu^-)\approx 3.2\times 10^{-9}\), the spin-independent cross department \(\sigma_{SI}\approx (1.0-1.5)\times 10^{-11}\,{\rm pb}\) too \(\sigma_{SD} \approx (4-6)\times 10^{-9}\,{\rm pb}\), too the proton lifetime\[

\tau (p\to e^+ \pi^0) \approx 1.3\times 10^{35}\,{\rm years}.

\] Those are cool, specific predictions that are almost independent of the choice of the dot inwards their parameter space. If 1 takes those claims seriously, theirs is a highly predictive theory.

But 1 argue I wrote this weblog postal service was their wonderfully optimistic, fairy-tale-styled rhetoric. For example, the 2d business office of their conclusions says:

While SUSY enthusiasts own got endured several setbacks over the prior few years amidst the discouraging results at the LHC inwards the search for supersymmetry, it is axiomatic that every bit a thing of course, dandy triumph emerges from momentary defeat. As the precession of naught observations at the LHC has certainly dampened the spirits of SUSY proponents, the determination of our analysis hither indicates that the request for SUSY may only travel getting interesting.

So dear SUSY proponents, only don't despair, furnish to your work, too larn laid upwards for the dandy victory.



Off-topic: Santa Claus is driving a Škoda too he parks on the roofs whenever he brings gifts to kids inwards the Chinese countryside. What a happy driver.