Many of his texts most the simple plenty physics are fantabulous – or at to the lowest degree really goodness high schoolhouse term papers. However, he sometimes writes most the state-of-the-art telephone commutation or particle physics in addition to all these texts are consummate garbage. Every skilful must encounter that Siegel isn't ane of them, he precisely doesn't sympathize the basic things in addition to his cognition doesn't transcend that of an average layman who has read several pop books on physics.
It's likewise bad that over 99% of his readers are totally incapable of figuring out that they're served consummate junk in addition to the self-confident musical note amongst which Siegel writes most these matters that are agency exterior his expertise is a business office of his scam.
That's also the example of his novel essay
MOND from holography, as I argued many years earlier Erik Verlinde.
To enjoin the least, the modified gravity remains a major "frontrunner" to the most justifiable in addition to smoothen theories of night affair – or theories that explicate the same phenomena that are sometimes attributed to night matter. To enjoin that all people must halt thinking most modified gravity is precisely crazy.
Third, supersymmetry. Siegel would similar to euthanize supersymmetry against its volition as well. As I mentioned, the commons holler describing the euthanasia against the victim's volition is a murder or homicide.
He says that it's been proven that SUSY cannot explicate the hierarchy occupation i.e. the lightness of the Higgs boson relatively to the Planck scale. There are at to the lowest degree 2 problems amongst this statement. First, it's untrue. Second, fifty-fifty if it were true, it precisely wouldn't "kill" all the reasons why sensible people believe that supersymmetry must be inwards Nature.
Concerning the electrical flow nation of supersymmetry in addition to naturalness, nosotros convey for certain constitute from the LHC that the incorporation of supersymmetry inwards Nature, if it's exploited past times Mother Nature at all, is less natural than a median supersymmetry researcher assumed a decade ago. However, it's only non truthful that supersymmetry is no longer compatible amongst naturalness. Naturalness is fuzzy, somewhat dependent on personal preferences, subjective flat of tolerance etc. But most papers that report this seriously only don't conclude that natural supersymmetry has been ruled out.
There's a lot of feasible models amongst diverse superpartner masses below \(1\TeV\). On elevation of that, it's only non truthful that all or most superpartner masses demand to hold upward this low-cal for naturalness. Two random papers. This April 2016 newspaper past times Baer in addition to iii co-authors estimates that ane needs to collect 3,000 inverse femtobarns of information at the LHC, most thirty times to a greater extent than than what has been collected, to make upward one's hear most the fate of natural SUSY. So they manifestly concluded that the viability of natural SUSY volition stay an opened upward enquiry for a long time.
Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 random similar newspaper – in that location are genuinely many papers similar that in addition to they stand upward for a mass of recent literature most SUSY in addition to naturalness: Dutta in addition to Mimura, August 2016. They scrap that MSSM amongst the electroweak supersymmetry breaking is even thus hold upward in addition to may hold upward live fifty-fifty if \(\mu\), the Higgsino mass, is large. So the LHC has only not excluded natural supersymmetry, permit lonely supersymmetry as a whole.
On elevation of that, zip has changed most the other reasons to detect SUSY attractive – its almost necessity inwards superstringy models of the Universe; gauge coupling unification; WIMP night affair candidate, in addition to others.
The LHC has shown that the hit of validity of the Standard Model is agency wider than a median particle physicist expected a decade agone (it hasn't deviated from my expectations much thus far because I was ever skeptical most claims that novel physics had to hold upward or thus the corner – it ever looked similar phenomenologists' bias to me, bias based on their wishing to teach the Nobel prize as shortly as possible). But some physics is even thus to hold upward expected at some minute of the time to come in addition to supersymmetry remains a elevation candidate for the large regard that volition hold upward tested – in addition to a large regard that telephone commutation physicists volition process really seriously fifty-fifty if the evidence volition piece of work along to hold upward absent.
To travail to "kill" supersymmetry is precisely some other proof of someone's consummate incompetence as a particle physicist. It's even thus as of import inwards theoretical studies; in addition to fifty-fifty inwards phenomenology, it even thus has most the same fraction of the interest, in addition to for goodness reasons.
Fourth, technicolor. That's the victim I am to the lowest degree eager to defend because technicolor looked badly motivated for a really long time. But to encounter is to a greater extent than positively, it has remained ane of the phenomenological ideas that the model builders are naturally reviving inwards ane agency or some other – ane of the elevation 10 ideas that are "not supersymmetry". Even if the justification for this regard is weak in addition to it has never been genuinely strong, you lot only cannot "kill" or "ban" ideas inwards the elevation 10 precisely because you lot dearest killing at a random minute for no goodness reason, as Siegel does.
Fifth, WIMP night matter. It's incredible inwards the combination amongst Siegel's proposed murder of MOND. If he wants to ban physicists' enquiry of both WIMP in addition to MOND, what is genuinely his explanation of the night matter? Dark affair may hold upward explained past times some MOND or composed of WIMPs, SIMPs, MACHOs, planetary size dark holes, axions, or 2 or iii other major "types of particles". But some of these explanations has to hold upward right. Or a dissimilar ane but ane can't switch to a novel explanation earlier a sensible novel ane is genuinely proposed.
According to numerous people, WIMP in addition to MOND could even thus hold upward the elevation 2 available explanations for these phenomena at this minute – in addition to Siegel would similar to "kill" i.e. ban both of them? What is his alternative? No night affair particle has been constitute straight fifty-fifty though it could convey happened a priori. But some explanation has to hold upward correct in addition to the probabilities of either answer haven't changed much past times the zero results of the experiments. In particular, WIMP remains an of import plausible epitome that researchers only cannot ban because they don't genuinely convey feasible replacements that would hold upward inwards a demonstrably ameliorate shape.
His wishing to brand these of import theories "die" without a falsification reflects his incompetence inwards telephone commutation physics in addition to mayhap his unstoppable wishing to murder for no goodness reason. Maybe Ethan Siegel needs to detect a goodness psychiatrist.
No comments:
Post a Comment