The guy who speaks at the kickoff sounds to a greater extent than or less similar a professional person but the testimonies acquire increasingly woman someone too ludicrous.
Renner was praised past times the women – he makes a totally woman someone surround for us. We tin practise whatever nosotros desire inwards whatsoever hours too drinkable coffee. In fact, I am exactly meaning for the instant time, too if I demand a 3rd baby, I volition exactly tell Renato. And then on. The video reminded me of the dystopia most equality. If the video inwards a higher house isn't plenty for you lot to run into that the women are at that spot mainly for the sex quotas, you lot must conduct maintain watched a dissimilar video.
It exactly happens that the same ETH Zurich exactly developed an amazing novel educational method:
New physics lessons assist girls conduct grip of up (see also Phys.Org)That's cool. Unfortunately, it's difficult to notice what's their "secret juice" that allowed them to shrink the sex gap. A paper tells us that the didactics was "enriched alongside evidence-based cognitively activating methods, such every bit inventing alongside contrasting cases or metacognitive questions". It sounds almost identical to the famous long would-be technical phrase that has impressed Feynman too that meant "people read".
I would bet that people who write inwards this pompous linguistic communication alongside a visibly depression concentration of whatsoever essence cannot maybe sympathise physics themselves. I conduct maintain both theoretical reasons that they can't too empirical reasons, too: I conduct maintain never met a counterexample. So how tin they pattern ameliorate methods to instruct it?
But fifty-fifty if you lot assumed that to a greater extent than or less alter of the way makes the sex gap smaller, is it what the efforts of "reformers of education" should live on doing? I don't think so. The run of schools should live on to maximally enrich too extended the students' interest, knowledge, understanding, too skills, amid other things. The methods shouldn't selectively assist to a greater extent than or less students to practise better.
All these articles comprise quite to a greater extent than or less evidence that all these activities boil downwardly to ideologically driven lies. For example, Ms Elsbeth [sic] Stern boldly asserts:
“Our enquiry shows that when proficient students don’t sympathise physics, it’s by too large due to the teaching methods.”Oh, really? How tin whatsoever enquiry demo a logical suggestion that is a contradiction? (Similar self-contradicting statements are made most the "intelligent" girls who exactly can't sympathise physics.) If a educatee doesn't sympathise physics, it shows that he or she isn't quite every bit proficient because a proficient educatee – at a schoolhouse where physics is taught too expected – has to sympathise physics (aside from other subjects). In fact, physics is almost certainly a ameliorate litmus bear witness for the students' lineament too intelligence than almost all other subjects. But inwards to a greater extent than or less cases, you lot can't conduct maintain facts too the reality, tin you, Ms Stern? It's easier for you lot to spin or rewrite the reality.
So the students alongside As from sex didactics or environmentalist courses or other worthless junk must live on proficient – too the physics courses must live on bad. Their instructors must live on the villains. Great. So the teaching must live on adjusted then that the bad students travel proficient – too perhaps vice versa.
It's sure possible. Instead of "a truck accelerates at a constant acceleration which is \(g\) times a constituent of the angle", students may larn "look, daddy truck carries the babe truck" which is what i of the twin girls of Larry Summers told the other when they were given toy trucks every bit a constituent of the emancipated education. (When Summers recalled this story inwards 2005, Ms Nancy Hopkins of MIT needed to throw up, then she left the conference too forthwith called her comrades inwards the large U.S.A. newspapers. After a frustrating year, the continuing nationwide hysteria of the brain-dead feminist led Summers to resign from a project that he had truly liked too was rattling proficient at.)
Stern too Sarah Hofer wrote a 2016 paper that is all most "intelligent girls" who must live on geniuses inwards physics except that they aren't, then it must live on the error of the evil reality.
What I am then annoyed past times is that schools similar ETH Zurich don't fifty-fifty attempt to pretend that they're making sure that the kids are all the same truly learning physics. I don't run into a unmarried comment most this obvious complaint. And I think that at that spot is no i at ETH Zurich – too no i alongside whatsoever important influence inwards Switzerland – who would live on going afterward the cervix of such efforts too who would live on trying to brand sure that the didactics is all the same physics too non to a greater extent than or less garbage. It looks similar it would live on considered politically wrong to fifty-fifty ask whether the lineament too validity of the content is truly preserved when the modifications are applied. They would almost certainly live on every bit shocked past times these questions every bit the defenders of the Czech SJW-style Hejný's method inwards mathematics. "Why didn't you lot warn us, manager Dr Rákosník, that someone could dare to disagree alongside the method over here?" they whined.
When it happens at schools similar ETH Zurich, it makes me doubly upset because due to the connections alongside Einstein (and dozens of other Nobel prize winners inwards the past), it's classify of a symbol. Einstein met Marič there. She could written report there, she was proficient enough, she was respected enough. But no i would attempt to create especial weather that would live on to a greater extent than beneficial for her than for the boys. Despite claims to the contrary, such organizations were much to a greater extent than fair towards groups too meritocratic 110-120 years agone than they are today.
As long every bit the students' learning is the goal, the modifications of the intuition don't truly help. If at that spot is a correlation betwixt to a greater extent than or less physical intuition too the alternative of empirical examples, the correlation applies to the people's understanding, too. When people notice the physical intuition natural, they are probable to sympathise the examples or metaphors too vice versa. There could live on other metaphors but the metaphors were invented past times to a greater extent than or less people who conduct maintain understood the physics knowledge. So if another people would select totally dissimilar metaphors but they didn't, it in all probability way that people who prefer such dissimilar metaphors aren't those who conduct maintain a large conduct a opportunity to sympathise the physics concepts, anyway, exactly because they patently haven't. For these reasons, fifty-fifty if the metaphors etc. were "male", girls must exactly larn the same ones. There is to a greater extent than or less "male bias" inwards physics at to a greater extent than or less level, whether you lot similar it or not, too the girls too women inwards physics exactly larn to live on "honorary boys too men" to a express extent. It makes absolutely no feel to attempt to delay this revelation past times the replacement of trucks alongside lipsticks.
ETH Zurich too lots of other institutions are beingness turned into pseudoscientific institutions where politically organized morons alongside worthless degrees from humanities are increasingly allowed to counterfeit too screw the reality, the truth, too the progress, too intimidate the people who truly belong there.